Syndicate this blog XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Categories

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 12

G 20 Peru meeting financial coverup/bailout continues

There was a photoop showing Bush shaking hands in a poncho with the Asian leaders and then some twaddle about free markets and no tariffs and continuation of all those great policies that led directly into this mess.

The big one being the Ponzi scheme of unregulated
"new financial instruments" which were bad loans wrapped deceptively into CDO/CDS and sold off to European and Asian banks and other investors that helped bring this crisis to the enormity it is now.

They trusted the American banking system. They didn't realize how big thieves Bush, Gramm and other republicans of the modern parasitic/vampire era are. They allowed every scammer domestic and foreign a free hand and protection. For a price.

Notice there was nothing said by Bush that these scams his administration blessed are to be rectified or the buyers are to be compensated in any way?

That would imply the banks did something wrong or restitution is due.

His team, as is his cronies, are in denial mode all the way.

Permalink11/25/08, 03:11:30 pm, by pete rock Email , 110 views, User Posts 8 feedbacks

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Timbuk3 [Member] Email
Wow, Pete, welcome back! I haven't seen you in a while!

Nice "conversation starter".

Check out this piece I read today:

Why the Rich Get Richer

Eve of Destruction: How the Financial Crisis Was Built Into the System
PermalinkPermalink 11/25/08 @ 15:53
Comment from: edjasie [Member] Email
Interesting read
PermalinkPermalink 11/25/08 @ 16:13
Comment from: Timbuk3 [Member] Email
PermalinkPermalink 11/25/08 @ 16:44
Comment from: edjasie [Member] Email
It reminds me of the PNAC
PermalinkPermalink 11/25/08 @ 16:48
Comment from: whatta [Member] Email
pete, I hate to be the bearer of bad news to you, but credit swaps date back into the mid-1990's probably an invention of J.P. Morgan. Recall which party was in office at that time? Also, recall that much of the current mess was a direct result of the "easy money" policies of the Fed under the previous admin(s). Pull up a graph of mortgage lending to see for yourself. Our equities have been falling and mortgage debt rising since the easing of interest rates in the mid 1980's...then we really partied and bought McMansions's in the 1990's with the dotcom bubble wealth effect...and then withdrew our housing bubble "equity" after Y2K.

Blame Bush for all the putrid mess in Iraq and many other things, but the blame for our finances and economy lies left and right and the roots go back way before Bush.
PermalinkPermalink 11/26/08 @ 09:43
Comment from: Timbuk3 [Member] Email
Not to deny (n any way) that the problem with our economic system is, well, "systemic" and goes back decades (probably to WW II), but...

How much does spending 10 gazillion dollars a month in Iraq contribute to people not being able to buy anything?
PermalinkPermalink 11/26/08 @ 11:08
Comment from: whatta [Member] Email
"How much does spending 10 gazillion dollars a month in Iraq contribute to people not being able to buy anything? "

I used to think the war and social spending were expensive and that the deficit was large...now all that seems a paltry sum in relation to the numbers tossed around for TARPing our distressed selves. A Trillion Dollars just isn't what it used to be. Fvck it, it is all Monopoly money now.

And, from what I have heard Obama say thus far, I think he will come up with some short term feel-good programs that will band-aid the problem and move it down the road another year or years. But, he is bringing in people that are of the same economic mentality as what is there currently (hence Wall Street's approval)...and credit and inflationary monetary policies will still be the rule.
PermalinkPermalink 11/26/08 @ 11:29
Comment from: Timbuk3 [Member] Email
"I think he will come up with some short term feel-good programs that will band-aid the problem and move it down the road another year or years."

I won't argue with that.

I would argue that the American people wouldn't have elected a President who would have done anything different.

We're like the abused spouse, married to unrestrained capitalism even as it beats us to death.

We won't leave it because "we love it".
PermalinkPermalink 11/26/08 @ 11:46

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.

Previous post: Maybe She Needs A Gay Neighbor?Next post: